This picture of my parents was snapped in the fall of 1983 on a Kodak 110 camera. My parents had leant me that camera ahead of a planned school field trip to Ottawa. It was the first time I was going to spend a weekend away from home, without my parents, and it was the nation’s capital, so they (and I) thought it important that I have a camera to record this event. This first picture was shot at the food court of the then newly-opened College Park. So much has changed since that date; the food court is probably not there, although the building certainly remains.

Today, Apple currently stores 20,743 digital photographs, snapped from September 2004 onward. Since cellphones and cameras merged and began taking decent pictures, photography has become commonplace, and not this momentous occasion where every photograph had to count — although I do recall that I was so excited by my new toy that I was taking so many pictures on the bus that my teacher threatened to take the camera away until there was something worth snapping. Today, Nora and Vivian, who are both younger than I was when I took this photograph, have cameras of their own, and are adding to our photo feed.

I do judiciously delete the blurry ones.

About six days ago, I reported to friends on Facebook that my father had a mild heart attack. I say ‘mild’ because it was mild; it was caught early, and did little to no damage to the heart. In a way, it was good that it happened, because it uncovered problems in the heart that needed attention, and could have gotten much worse if it hadn’t been attended to. Still, there’s nothing ‘mild’ about a heart attack.

As I type this, my father is currently in surgery, having a double bypass to get around calcium buildups in his heart. He’s in the best place for such a procedure (St. Mary’s Hospital), and he’s in good hands. The prognosis for recovery is excellent. But, of course, the waiting is hard, and recovery is going to be hard. Fortunately, the support and kindness we’ve received in the past week have been more than heartening.

It’s still a shock, though, and a stern reminder that time is still marching on. More things will change from the time I took the photograph. I don’t like it, but there’s not much I can do about it, except add to the memories.

Always remember to keep adding to the memories.

(Update: 5:08 p.m.): We’ve just heard from the surgeon and the operation appears to have gone well. There’s still some things that need to be done before we can see Eric, but it appears we are out of the woods. Fingers crossed.


For a variety of reasons, we got out of the habit of giving the kids their allowances back in October. One of the reasons was money was tight due to a delayed advance cheque; the other reason was things were so busy planning a home sale and a move, it just slipped our minds. When the time came to rectify this oversight, and give the kids their moneys owed, a substantial amount had collected, so we encouraged them to save a third of it, spend a third of it, and give a third of it to charity.

The local humane society got a $140 donation, and the kids have money put away. For the remainder, the kids decided the big-spending item would be a weekend at the Great Wolf Lodge water park over a weekend. We quietly rounded up the expense, but the girls firmly believe they are treating us.

Whatever the case, the kids are enjoying themselves tremendously. And the Great Wolf Lodge is basically a license to print money. The place is packed. And in addition to a waterpark, there’s a scavenger hunt game involving magic wands and items that light up when zapped. I haven’t worn my iPhone to the waterpark, but I still managed to put 12,000 steps onto the pedometer, and we haven’t been outside the hotel all day.

I think the kids will sleep well, tonight. Certainly, we will.

The website ABvote has been following the Albertan election super closely and, yesterday, released this startling poll. You can see the results (along with other polls earlier in this campaign below:


I would wager that anybody who has been following Albertan politics for any length of time saw their jaw drop to the floor. However, ignore the stunning graph for a moment, and take the time to read the article itself, which goes on at length for why we shouldn’t take this poll at face value.

The reasoning goes like this: the pollster contacts 1,798 people, of whom 1,153 are decided, asks them questions about their demographics, and then asks them who they intend to vote for in the coming election. The NDP gets 44% across the province, 61% in Edmonton, and leads in every other region. Wow.

But hold on, says the pollster: we think the Conservatives are heading towards a minority government. Why? Because they asked another very interesting question: who do you think your next door neighbour intends to vote for in the coming election. The results? The NDP gets 34%, the Progressive Conservatives get 28%, the Wild Rose Party get 21%, the Liberals get 10%, and the Alberta Party get 6%.

This strikes me as an odd question to ask on a number of fronts. One: who still talks about politics with their neighbours anymore? After all, we have Facebook to sound off on our issues, and the anonymity of the Internet allows us to hold those opinions without fear of major real-life repercussions. You have to live next to your next door neighbour, so I would guess that I would be more reluctant to raise political issues with them in case there is disagreement.

Unless, of course, you’re asking what colour lawn sign the neighbour has. That might be a good indicator — although it’s worth noting that there are many examples where lawn sign placements weren’t a good predictor of election results.

But if Albertans are generally assuming “Oh, the PCs will win”, because “they always win”, that’s not the best way to go out and vote, in my opinion. I mean, are you voting Wild Rose or New Democrat because you honestly want change and think that these parties will bring in change that you want? Or are you expressing yourself by boldly voting against the PCs while secretly hoping that your neighbours will save you from your choice?

This mentality has risks. To avoid potential political hangovers come May 6th, I would recommend that Albertans decide for themselves who they want to vote for, rather than who they want to protest against. The government that gets elected is on the backs of you as well as your neighbours. Take responsibility for it and vote with your heart.

It's been a while since I last updated this blog. Not only has it been busy, here, with three non-fiction commissions to be done (the last is due this Monday), I've been down with a cold. I thought it was allergies at first on Monday, but by late Monday the allergy meds weren't helping and by Tuesday, I really needed to lie down. Today is the first day I've been up and around without medication, but the cold still lingers.

Grandpa Wendell paid us a visit on Monday, arriving by air at Buffalo. He'll be staying for Nora's birthday, before heading back to Fresno on the 30th. The kids are delighted to see him, and a grand day out in Toronto is planned.

Meanwhile, politics have gotten very interesting in Alberta.

For the uninitiated, Canada's oil province is having an election this May, and the current Conservative government, living a 44-year-long dynasty, is in trouble. The upstart further-conservative Wild Rose Party, which gave them such a scare in the previous election, did not roll over and die when Conservative leader Jim Prentice convinced the then-Wild Rose leader Danielle Smith and about half of the party's MLAs to cross the floor to the government side. Under the far more determined (and pretty darn savvy) leadership of Brian Jean, the party has pulled far ahead of the Conservatives in the polls, and the Conservatives seem to be at the end of their bag of tricks.

For political geeks like myself, this is interesting in and of itself. Alberta doesn't elect governments, it elects dynasties. The Conservatives have governed Alberta since 1971, when they emerged from just six seats and roared into power, replacing the Social Credit government, which had itself governed since 1935. Back then, the SoCreds themselves emerged from virtually nowhere to defeat the United Farmers party, which had governed since 1921. And the United Farmers? They defeated the Liberal Party, that had governed since 1905, when the province was founded.

Do the math, and you'll see, in the 110 years since coming into existence, Alberta has elected exactly four different parties to power. They've come, they've governed and, once defeated, they've never been allowed into power again. When the province celebrates its 110th birthday this September, it might just have government number five.

But what makes this government extra interesting is that, if you believe some polls (and any should be taken with a grain of salt at this point), that fifth government might not be Wild Rose. It might be New Democrat.

Alberta has always had a reputation (somewhat undeserved, in my opinion) of being the most conservative of Canada's provinces (people have not seen rural Ontario). So for the social democratic NDP to come out of nowhere and flirt with the prospect of power here should send notice to those Canadians who dismiss Albertans as rednecks.

True, a week is a lifetime in politics, and Alberta's election is two weeks away, but I am confident enough in my read of Conservative leader Jim Prentice's body language that the Conservatives will fall this election. They may even come in third. The fact that the polls show this, even though Prentice is facing a smashed and rebuilding Wild Rose Party and the upstart New Democrats suggests to me that Albertans are fed up and are ready for change. They're not sure who will lead that change, yet, but they know who they DON'T want in power after May. I'll make my prediction now and eat whatever crow I have to, but this seismic shift in Alberta's politics is as interesting as that volcano in Chile that just erupted, and I'm watching with rapt attention.

What I find most interesting about Prentice's political body language in this campaign is how most of his attacks have been against the NDP, in spite of the fact that the Wild Rose Party were the first to pull ahead of the Conservatives in the polls. Examples of his focus on his left flank include his inept comeback against NDP leader Rachel Notley during the leaders' debate where he misquoted the NDP's capital tax policy and then said "math is difficult". He followed this up with the bold statement that Alberta is "not an NDP province". If he truly believed that, why would he be spending so much attention on the NDP? Doesn't his concern suggest that he knows that the NDP surge is real? Or is it that he is far more used to federal politics where he only had to fight competitors on his left rather than competitors on his right? Where are the Conservative attack ads against the Wild Rose party? They may be out there, but they aren't nearly so prominent as they were in the previous election.

But then, what does Prentice have to attack the Wild Rose party with? He supposedly moved the Conservatives to the right by absorbing Danielle Smith and her minions. What separates the Conservatives from the Wild Rose Party now? From the Wild Rose perspective, they can argue that they don't have the Conservatives' stench of corruption, patronage, incompetence, and the sense of so-darn-tired-after-44-years-of-governing that polls suggest Albertans are getting pretty darn tired of. It's also worth noting that Brian Jean acted far faster than former leader Danielle Smith did in moving against social conservative whackos in his party after they spoke out of turn, stemming the easy complaints that helped bring down the Wild Rose Party in the previous election.

It's also worth noting that Notley's NDP has, from this perspective at least, been similarly polite when dealing with the Wild Rose party. Notley herself has even said that she'd willingly work with the Wild Rose party if the May election resulted in a minority goverment. That might be the smartest move of this campaign. If you believe, or want to suggest, that the Conservatives and the Wild Rose Party have roughly the same policies, then there is no reason to fearmonger over a potential Wild Rose victory because, really, what do you lose if they win? You still have the same government that ever was in power. And if you do start to suggest that the Wild Rose party is substantially more right wing than the Conservatives, then you end up driving fearful progressives into propping up the Prentice Conservatives, robbing the NDP of the best chance they've ever had of influencing the government in Alberta.

Notley and Jean's campaigns have been focused, and they've been remarkably free of fearmongering, especially when it comes to each other, likely because each knows that the other is their best ally in bringing the Conservatives down. That leaves Prentice looking like a deer in the headlights. And, for some, who were more than a little put out that a government could convince the leader of the official opposition to betray the people who voted and volunteered for her, that's a satisfying dose of karma.

We shall see come May.


I’ve long had a love-hate relationship with the Robarts Library in the University of Toronto St. George Campus, otherwise known as the Giant Turkey on Hoskin, or Fort Book. The building puts the Brutal in “Brutalism”.

Forty years on, and it’s time to expand. Rather than tearing the thing to the ground, the University is proposing an expansion. The result, to me, looks like lipstick on a pig.

I shouldn’t be too hard on the current architect, though. I’m betting the inside will look great with all that natural light. And there probably isn’t the budget to tear the whole building down and start again. Still, trying to work with the Robarts’ original design seems an insurmountable challenge.

Recent Entries

On This Day

Recent Comments